Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin - Startseite

2026

• Bartscherer, S. F., & Reinhart, M. (2026). Replication as a Social Movement: Categorising Actors in the Transdisciplinary Community Forming around Replications. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21338305
• Bartscherer, S. F. (2026). Cultures of Trial and Error: The Narrative Side of (Open) Science. Blog of Trial and Error. https://doi.org/10.36850/448e9a73-75b2

• Cramer, M., & Reinhart, M. (2026). Governing Science through Evaluation: A Global Heuristic of Research Evaluation Regimes. Minerva. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-026-09633-2

• Knoblauch, H., Schröder, D. J., Sibert, L., & Brandt, F. (Eds.). (2026). Communicative Constructivism and the Empirical Study of Social Reality: Contributions to a New Theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003600619

• Moawad, L. (2026). Local university alliances, capital cities, and the ‘New Geography of Knowledge’ in Europe. Europe of Knowledge. https://era.ideasoneurope.eu/2026/06/09/local-university-alliances-capital-cities-and-the-new-geography-of-knowledge-in-europe/

• Moawad, L., & Gollanek, J. (2026). ‘To survive, you must tell stories.’ Comparing success narratives of local university alliances and networks in European capital cities. European Journal of Higher Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2026.2648833

• Moawad, L., & Schendzielorz, C. (2026). Knowledge metropolises? A comparative multi-scale analysis of local university alliances in capital cities. European Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041261437238

• Sachse, J. (2026). How scientometric indicators shape relevance: An exploratory experimental user study. Scientometrics, 131(7), 4253–4275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05665-3
• Sachse, J. (2026). Synchronous and sequential modes of SERP-based relevance evaluation. The Search Engines and Society Network Annual Conference (SEASON 2026). https://doi.org/10.48441/4427.3709

• Stephen, D., Schniedermann, A., Lovakov, A., Schmidt, M., Ottaviani, M., Sorgatz, N., Cruz Romero, R., Möller, T., Aman, V., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2026). Implicit reporting standards in bibliometric research: What can reviewers’ comments tell us about reporting completeness? Quantitative Science Studies, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1162/QSS.a.496

• Ulpts, S., Bartscherer, S. F., Penders, B., & Nelson, N. C. (2026). Epistemic oligarchisation: Exploring capture and concentration through science reform. Science as Culture, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2026.2702917

• Wendt, S. P. (2026). Examining diversity, equity and inclusion policies in academic publishing through a decolonial lens. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-09-2025-0124

2025

2024

• Ambrasat, J., Lüdtke, D., & Yankova, Y. (2024). Schwerpunktbericht des Berlin Science Surveys. Pilotstudie 2021/22. (Wissenstransfer. Forschungspraktiken im Berliner Forschungsraum.). Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. https://doi.org/10.18452/29605
• Ambrasat, J., Lüdtke, D., & Yankova, Y., & Cutler, J. (2024). Berlin Science Survey—Bringing the Scientists’ Perspectives into Research Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14160956
• Bartscherer, S. F.(2024). Why Regimes Shift: On Suggestive Actions and Their Implications for French Pragmatism. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/7a2vy
• Brankovic, J. (2024). Media Review: Competition: What it is and why it happens. Organization Studies, 45(6), 903–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231197810
• Brankovic, J. (2024). Worlds of rankings research. In A. Krüger, T. Peetz, & H. Schaefer (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Valuation and Society (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003229353
• Cramer, M. (2024). Lektionen aus der New World Group: Anglophon-karibische Sozialwissenschaften in den 1960er Jahren aus wissenschaftssoziologischer Perspektive. In F. Santos & C. Ruvituso (Eds.), Globale Soziologie: Vergessene Theorien, verflochtene Geschichten (pp. 83–111). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-44022-0_4
• Cramer, M. (2024). The Lyrical Theorizing of Colonial Rule in the work of Trutz von Trotha. In F. Anicker & A. Armbruster (Eds.), Die Praxis soziologischer Theoriebildung (pp. 73–99). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-44055-8_4
• Hesselmann, F., & Reinhart, M. (2024). From scandal to reform: Approaches to research integrity at a turning point. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 11(1), 2414491. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2414491
• Lüdtke, D., & Ambrasat, J. (2024). Methodenbericht Berlin Science Survey. https://doi.org/10.18452/31126
• Lüdtke, D., Yankova, Y., & Ambrasat, J. (2024). Wissenstransfer. Forschungspraktiken im Berliner Forschungsraum. https://doi.org/10.18452/27941

• Langenhove, L. V., Shendrikova, D., Mays, C., Pardo-Diaz, J., Mauduit, J.-C., Lacunza, I., Shawrav, M. M.,  Reinhart, M., Colombo, E., & Dall, E. (2024). Strengthening Science Diplomacy in and for Europe through Horizon Europe [Policy Brief]. https://www.science-diplomacy.eu/media/Policy-Brief_EU-SD-Alliance_Horizon-Europe_Feb-2024_Final-release1-1.pdf

• Reinhart, M. & Schendzielorz, C. (2024). Peer-review procedures as practice, decision, and governance—The road to theories of peer review. Science and Public Policy, 51(3), 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad089

• Schendzielorz, C., & Reinhart, M. (2024). Was leistet Peer Review? Forschung & Lehre, 3(3), 190–191. https://esv-elibrary.de/journal/article/99.160005/ful.2024.03.13

• Wendt, S. P., Litvin, L., & Clinic, H. (2024). Epistemic and Social Diversity as an Aspect of Evaluating Interdisciplinary Research. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 42(1–2), 223–248. https://interdisciplinarystudies.org/vol42-epistemic-and-social-diversity-as-an-aspect-of-evaluating-interdisciplinary-research/

2023

• Ambrasat, J., & Lüdtke, D. (2023). Berlin Science Survey—Pilotstudie 2021/22. https://doi.org/10.18452/27292
• Cramer, M. (2023). Colonial Scholars and Anti-Colonial Agents: Politics of Academic Knowledge Production Between the West Indies and London in the Mid-20th Century. Sociology Lens, 36(2), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12417
• Hendriks, B., & Reinhart, M. (2023). What are the chances? Clinician scientist` career pathways in Germany. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 642. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04584-8
• Hesselmann, F. (2023). A Tale of Two Academic Communities: Digital Imaginaries of Automatic Screening Tools in Editorial Practice. Minerva, 61(2), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09484-7

• Hornbostel, S., Schendzielorz, C., & Aman, V. (2023). Ehre, wem Ehre gebührt—Autorschaftskonzepte und Praktiken in der Wissenschaft. In F. Wächter & A. Hermann (Eds.), Karrieren in der Wissenschaft (pp. 63–84). Kohlhammer. https://doi.org/10.17433/978-3-17-039569-5

• Lüdtke, D., Schaffer, F., & Ambrasat, J. (2023). Open Science. Forschungspraktiken im Berliner Forschungsraum. https://doi.org/10.18452/26224
• Lüdtke, D., Schaffer, F., & Ambrasat, J. (2023). Open Science. Research Practices in the Berlin Research Area. https://doi.org/10.18452/26225
• Lüdtke, D., Yankova, Y., & Ambrasat, J. (2023). Cooperation. Research Practices in the Berlin Research Area. https://doi.org/10.18452/27060
• Lüdtke, D., Yankova, Y., & Ambrasat, J. (2023). Kooperationen. Forschungspraktiken im Berliner Forschungsraum. https://doi.org/10.18452/27061
• Reinhart, M. (Guest Expert), Meyer, A. (Host). (2023). Namedropping in der Forschung: Leistung ist doch nicht alles [Broadcast]. https://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/namedropping-in-der-forschung-leistung-ist-doch-nicht-alles-dlf-kultur-d41634c6-100.html
• Reinhart, M. (2023). Wertvolle Forschung: Die Konstruktion, Produktion, Bewertung und Sicherung wissenschaftlicher Qualität. In D. Kaldewey (Ed.), Wissenschaftsforschung (pp. 203–220). De Gruyter Oldenbourg. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110713800-010
• Reinhart, M. (2023). Wissenschaftsforschung lehren: Erfahrungen aus der Lehrpraxis. In D. Kaldewey (Ed.), Wissenschaftsforschung (pp. 339–350). De Gruyter Oldenbourg. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110713800-016

• Schlegel, A., & Wendt, S. P. (2023). Solidarity and Care during the Dawn of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Towards Relationality in Collective Learning. In Humanities and Social Sciences Perspectives on COVID-19. Africa Century Editions Press. https://acepress.co.za/product/humanities-and-social-sciences-perspectives-on-covid-19-e-book/

2022

• Ambrasat, J., & Martens, B. (2022). Stabilität oder Krisengefahr? Die Finanzierung von Promotionen im Verlauf. In S. Korff & I. Truschkat (Eds.), Übergänge in Wissenschaftskarrieren: Ereignisse – Prozesse – Strategien (pp. 33–54). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35717-7_3
• Ambrasat, J., & Scheve, C. von. (2022). Affective meanings and social relations: Identities and positions in the social space. Emotions and Society, 4(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1332/263169021X16340311969719
• Bartscherer, S. F. (2022). Emotion in British politics – a mixed methods analysis of Conservative and Labour Party speeches from 1900–2019. European Politics and Society, 24(5), 680–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2022.2081016
• Cramer, M. (2022). Theorising the Caribbean against the grain. How West Indian social scientists established the Caribbean as a space of knowledge production in the 1950s. Sociedade e Estado, 37, 835–859. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202237030004
• Hendriks, B., & Seifert, M. (2022). Wissenschaft und berufliche Praxis in der Graduierten- ausbildung Dritter Zwischenbericht der Begleitforschung. https://www.dzhw.eu/pdf/ab_26/Hendriks_Seifert_2022_Wiss_und_berufl_Praxis_Report.pdf
• Knöchelmann, M., Hesselmann, F., Reinhart, M., & Schendzielorz, C. (2022). The Rise of the Guest Editor—Discontinuities of Editorship in Scholarly Publishing. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.748171
• Lange, J., & Ambrasat, J. (2022). Familie, Karriere oder beides? Die spezifischen Vereinbarkeitsprobleme im Wissenschaftsbereich. In S. Korff & I. Truschkat (Eds.), Übergänge in Wissenschaftskarrieren: Ereignisse – Prozesse – Strategien (pp. 95–123). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35717-7_6
• Lüdtke, D. & Ambrasat, J. (2022). Basic Report Berlin Science Survey. https://doi.org/10.18452/26223
• Lüdtke, D. & Ambrasat, J. (2022). Basisauswertung Berlin Science Survey. https://doi.org/10.18452/26222
• Lüdtke, D. & Ambrasat, J. (2022). Methodenbericht Berlin Science Survey. https://doi.org/10.18452/26212
• Lüdtke, D. & Ambrasat, J. (2022). Methods Report Berlin Science Survey. https://doi.org/10.18452/26215

• Moawad, L. (2022). À l’ombre du poltergeist. Peeves, de personnage fantôme à ghost character dans la saga Harry Potter. Pagaille, Les personnages de l’ombre dans la littérature et les arts, 2, 25–36. https://revue-pagaille.fr/2022-2-moawad/

• Moawad, L., & Schendzielorz, C. (2022). Metamorphoses and performativity. Transformative R&I policies and their norm(alis)ing effect of societal impact. fteval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, (53), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2022.545

• Reinhart, M. (2022). Open Science as an Engine of Anxiety: How Scientists Promote and Defend the Visibility of Their Digital Selves, while Becoming Fatalistic about Academic Careers. In A. M. Brighenti (Ed.), The New Politics of Visibility (pp. 175–200). Intellect Books. https://www.intellectbooks.com/the-new-politics-of-visibility

• Reinhart, M., & Dawson, S. (2022). Sollte im Peer-Review die Identität offengelegt werden? Horizonte - Das Schweizer Forschungsmagazin. https://www.horizonte-magazin.ch/2022/06/02/sollte-im-peer-review-die-identitaet-offengelegt-werden/

• Sachse, J., & Leckert, M. (2022). Quality, impact, productivity: Researchers’ conceptions of bibliometric indicators and altmetrics. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7337147
• Schendzielorz, C. (2022). Selbstpositivierung als Selbstverhältnis des optimierten Selbst?". In M. Eulenbach & T. Fuchs (Eds.), Selbstoptimierung – theoretische und empirische Erkundungen. Beltz Juventa. https://beltz.de/fachmedien/erziehungswissenschaft/selbstoptimierung-theoretische-und-empirische-erkundungen/BEL445309
• Schendzielorz, C., & Reinhart, M. (2022). Relating Democratic and Scientific Ethos in Academic Self-Governance: Governing Science Through Peer Review and the Democratizing Potential of Lotteries. Serendipities. Journal for the Sociology and History of the Social Sciences, 6(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.7146/serendipities.v6i2.130745

2021

• Ambrasat, J. (2021). Zur Arbeitssituation des wissenschaftlichen Mittelbaus in Deutschland. In P. Holderberg & C. Seipel (Eds.), Der wissenschaftliche Mittelbau – Arbeit, Hochschule, Demokratie. Beltz Juventa.
• Ambrasat, J., & Fabian, G. (2021). One year after the outbreak – Involvement of scientists in the Covid-19 pandemic Findings from a Germany-wide study. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/56r3u
• Bartscherer, S. F. (2021). Instrumentalization of Emotion During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election: A Neopragmatist Analysis of the Presidential Nominees’ Media Communication. In P. Helfritzsch & J. Müller Hipper (Eds.), Edition Moderne Postmoderne (1st ed., pp. 321–372). transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839452783-022
• Frisch, T., Laser, S., Matthäus, S., & Schendzielorz, C. (2021). It’s worth the trouble. On valuation studies and climate change. Economic Sociology_the European Electronic Newsletter, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00936-0
• Hendriks, B. (2021). A Review of Mark Dennis Robinson, The Market in Mind—How Financialization is Shaping Neuroscience, Translational Medicine and Innovation in Biotechnology. Minerva, 59(1), 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09432-x
• Hendriks, B., & Lietz, A. (2021). Erkenntnisgewinn durch Praxis: Empirische Einblicke in die neuen Wege der Doktorand*innenausbildung. Forschung: Politik - Strategie - Management, 14(1+2), 6–9.
• Hendriks, B., Schendzielorz, C., Heger, C., & Reinhart, M. (2021). Kritische Bestandsaufnahme des BIH Charité (Junior) Clinician Scientist Programms: Untersuchungen einer integrierten Forschungs- und Facharztweiterbildung in der Universitätsmedizin. Ergebnisse der Programmevaluation 2019/20. DZHW. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6304191

• Hendriks, B., Schendzielorz, C., Heger, C., & Reinhart, M. (2021). Kritische Bestandsaufnahme des BIH Charité (Junior) Clinician Scientist Programms: Untersuchungen einer integrierten Forschungs- und Facharztweiterbildung in der Universitätsmedizin. Ergebnisse der Programmevaluation 2019/20. DZHW. https://www.dzhw.eu/pdf/ab_26/KritischeBestandsaufnahme.pdf

• Hendriks, B., Schendzielorz, C., Heger, C., & Reinhart, M. (2021). Kritische Bestandsaufnahme des BIH Charité (Junior) Clinician Scientist Programms: Untersuchungen einer integrierten Forschungs- und Facharztweiterbildung in der Universitätsmedizin. Ergebnisse der Programmevaluation 2019/20. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6304191

• Hesselmann, F. (2021). Gebührender Respekt—Zum Umgang mit wissenschaftlichem Fehlverhalten. Forschung & Lehre, 6(21), 470–471.
• Hesselmann, F. (2021). Gizasks: What Is the Most Important Scientific Development of the Last 50 Years? (D. Kolitz, Interviewer) [Blog Post]. https://gizmodo.com/what-is-the-most-important-scientific-development-of-th-1847518361
• Hesselmann, F.. (2021). „Problematisch wird es dort, wo sich Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft berühren“ [Blog Post]. Gerda Henkel Stiftung. https://lisa.gerda-henkel-stiftung.de/fehlverhalten
• Hesselmann, F., & Reinhart, M. (2021). Cycles of invisibility: The limits of transparency in dealing with scientific misconduct. Social Studies of Science, 51(3), 414–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720975201
• Hesselmann, F., & Schendzielorz, C. (2021). Rhetorical power in evaluations: Tracing the construction of value-measurement links in debates on societal impact. In P. Dahler-Larsen (Ed.), A Research Agenda for Evaluation (pp. 209–224). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839101083.00017
• Hesselmann, F., Schendzielorz, C., & Krüger, A. K. (2021). Sichtbarkeitskonstellationen im Journal Peer Review – Konsequenzen von In/Transparenz in wissenschaftlichen Bewertungsverfahren. In O. Berli, S. Nicolae, & H. Schäfer (Eds.), Bewertungskulturen (pp. 71–92). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33409-3_4
• Hesselmann, F., Schendzielorz, C., & Sorgatz, N. (2021). Say my name, say my name: Academic authorship conventions between editorial policies and disciplinary practices. Research Evaluation, 30(3), 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab003
• Krüger, A. K., Hesselmann, F., & Hartstein, J. (2021). Bewertung in und durch digitale Infrastrukturen. In F. Meier & T. Peetz (Eds.), Organisation und Bewertung (pp. 101–128). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31549-8_5
• Luo, J., Feliciani, T., Reinhart, M., Hartstein, J., Das, V., Alabi, O., & Shankar, K. (2021). Analyzing sentiments in peer review reports: Evidence from two science funding agencies. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(4), 1271–1295. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00156
• Marguin, S., Haus, J., Heinrich, J., Kahl, A., Schendzielorz, C., & Singh, A. (2021). Positionality Reloaded: Debating the Dimensions of Reflexivity in the Relationship Between Science and Society; An Editorial. Historical Social Research, 46(2), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.46.2021.2.7-34
• Sachse, J. (2021). Bibliometric Indicators and Relevance Criteria – An Online Experiment. In I. Frommholz, P. Mayr, G. Cabanac, & S. Verberne (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Bibliometric-enhanced Information Retrieval (pp. 69–77). CEUR. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2847/
• Ziegler, R., Fischer, L., Ambrasat, J., Fabian, G., Niemann, P., & Buz, C. (2021). Wissenschaftskommunikation in Deutschland Ergebnisse einer Befragung unter Wissenschaftler:innen. DZHW, WiD, NaWik. https://www.wb.dzhw.eu/pdf/2021_WisskommBefragung_Ergebnisbroschuere_WiD_DZHW_NaWik.pdf

2020

• Bartscherer, S. F. (2020). Instrumentalization of Emotion During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election—A Neopragmatist Analysis of the Presidential Nominees’ Media Communication. Presentation at the Conference of the ESA RN11 Sociology of Emotions "9th MIDTERM CONFERENCE ON EMOTIONS, Barcelona, Spain (online). https://www.ub.edu/emotions20/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Abstractbook_9th_Midterm_RN11.pdf
• Bartscherer, S. F. (2020). Instrumentalization of Emotion During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election—A Neopragmatist Analysis of the Presidential Nominees’ Media Communication. Lecture on the conference ESA RN32 Political Sociology “Back to the Future? European Progression and Retrogressions,” Maynooth, Ireland (online). https://www.europeansociology.org/research-networks/rn32-political-sociology
• Hendriks, B.. (2020). Der geplante Ausstieg aus der Wissenschaft Ein Praxisbeispiel aus strukturierten Promotionsformen der Geistes‐, Kultur‐ und Gesellschaftswissenschaften. die hochschule. journal für wissenschaft und bildung, (1). https://www.dzhw.eu/pdf/pub_art/26/hendriks_2020_der_%20geplante_austieg_aus_der_wissenschaft.pdf
• Hendriks, B., & Lietz, A. (2020). Zum Profil praxisorientiert Promovierender in den Geistes-, Kultur- und Gesellschaftswissenschaften. Ergebnisse aus der Begleitstudie „Wissenschaft und berufliche Praxis in der Graduiertenausbildung“. DZHW. https://www.dzhw.eu/pdf/28/hendriks_lietz_2020_profil_praxisorientierter_promovierender_in_gkg.pdf
• Hendriks, B., & Reinhart, M. (2020). Science Blogs as Critique—Building Public Identities in the Field of Translational Research. Science & Technology Studies, 33(3), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.75153

• Hesselmann, F. (2020). Die Bestrafung wissenschaftlichen Fehlverhaltens. Zwischen Selbstreinigung und autoritativer Sanktion. transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839452523

• Hesselmann, F., & Reinhart, M. (2020). Fragmentierte Sichtbarkeiten. Kriminologisches Journal, (1). https://content-select.com/de/portal/media/view/5ee2369b-ce84-4fe5-9ae2-4641b0dd2d03
• Krüger, A. K., & Hesselmann, F. (2020). Sichtbarkeit und Bewertung. Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 49(2–3), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2020-0015
• Reinhart, M., & Schendzielorz, C. (2020). The lottery in Babylon—On the role of chance in scientific success. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(sup2), S25–S29. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1806429
• Schaffer, H., & Schaffer, F. (2020). Empirische Methoden für soziale Berufe. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung in die qualitative und quantitative Sozialforschung. Lambertus-Verlag. https://search.gesis.org/publication/bibsonomy-schaffer2020empirische
• Schendzielorz, C., & Reinhart, M. (2020). Die Regierung der Wissenschaft im Peer Review / Governing Science Through Peer Review. dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 13(1), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v13i1.10
• Simons, A., Hendriks, B., Reinhart, M., & Ahmed, F. (2020). How practitioners between bench and bedside evaluate biomedical translation? Science and Public Policy, 47(4), 561–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa035
• Simons, A., Riedel, N., Toelch, U., Hendriks, B., Müller-Ohlraun, S., Liebenau, L., Ambrasat, J., Dirnagl, U., & Reinhart, M.. (2020). Assessing the Organizational Climate for Translational Research with a New Survey Tool. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(6), 2893–2910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00234-0

2019

• Ambrasat, J. (2019). Planned Missing Data Design in a General Population Rating Study. 8th Conference of the European Survey Research Association (ESRA), Zagreb, Kroatien. https://www.europeansurveyresearch.org/conf2019/prog.php?sess=254#728
• Ambrasat, J., & Lietz, A. (2019). Effects of announced survey length and incentive in a highly qualified population—A survey experiment. 8th Conference of the European Survey Research Association (ESRA), Zagreb, Kroatien.
• Bartscherer, S. F. (2019). Preliminary Results: Instrumentalization of Emotion During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election—A Neopragmatist Analysis of the Presidential Nominees’ Media Communication. 14th Conference of the European Sociological Association, Manchester, United Kingdom.
• Bartscherer, S. F. (2019). Preliminary Results: Instrumentalization of Emotion During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election—A Neopragmatist Analysis of the Presidential Nominees’ Media Communication. DGPhil-Tagung “Die Emotionalisierung des Politischen,” Jena, Deutschland.
• Bartscherer, S. F. (2019). Propagandistische Vorbereitungen der Shoah. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag. https://www.isbn.de/buch/9783961381470/propagandistische-vorbereitungen-der-shoah
• Gaertner, B., Koschollek, C., Grube, M. M., Lüdtke, D., Fuchs, J., Scheidt-Nave, C., Gößwald, A., & Wetzstein, M. (2019). Including nursing home residents in a general population health survey in Germany. Survey Methods: Insights from the Field (SMIF). https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2019-00010
• Gaertner, B., Lüdtke, D., Koschollek, C., Grube, M. M., Baumert, J., Scheidt-Nave, C., Gößwald, A., Fuchs, J., & Wetzstein, M. (2019). Effects of a sequential mixed-mode design on participation, contact and sample composition – Results of the pilot study “IMOA – Improving Health Monitoring in Old Age.” Survey Methods: Insights from the Field (SMIF). https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2019-00016
• Hendriks, B., Heger, C., & Hornbostel, S. (2019). Wissenschaft und berufliche Praxis in der Graduiertenausbildung. Erste Befunde aus der Begleitforschung. DZHW.
• Hendriks, B., Simons, A., & Reinhart, M. (2019). What are Clinician Scientists Expected to do? The Undefined Space for Professionalizable Work in Translational Biomedicine. Minerva, 57, 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09367-4
• Hesselmann, F. (2019). Die simulierte Moral: Fehlverhalten und Sanktion in der Wissenschaft. In S. Joller & M. Stanisavljevic (Eds.), Moralische Kollektive: Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Einsichten (pp. 153–176). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22978-8_9
• Hesselmann, F., & Reinhart, M. (2019). Science Means Never Having to Say You’re Sorry? Apologies for Scientific Misconduct. Science Communication, 41(5), 552–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019860848
• Hesselmann, F., & Schendzielorz, C. (2019). Evaluations as value-measurement links: Exploring metrics and meanings in science. Theorising Measures, Rankings and Metrics, Special Issue for Social Science Information, 58(2), 282–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018419850771
• Krueger, A. K., Hendriks, B., & Gauch, S. (2019). The multiple meanings of translational research in (bio)medical research. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 41(4), 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-019-0293-7
• Reinhart, M. (2019). Fraud and Misconduct in Research: Detection, Investigation, and Organizational Response. By Nachman Ben-Yehuda and Amalya Oliver-Lumerman. American Journal of Sociology, 124(5), 1598–1600. https://doi.org/10.1086/701692
• Reinhart, M., Krüger, A. K., & Hesselmann, F. (2019). Nach der Bewertung ist vor der Bewertung – Sichtbarkeit und Emotionalität als verbindende Elemente von Bewertungsprozessen. In S. Nicolae, M. Endreß, O. Berli, & D. Bischur (Eds.), (Be)Werten. Beiträge zur sozialen Konstruktion von Wertigkeit (pp. 125–145). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21763-1_6
• Ruß, U., Ambrasat, J., & Lietz, A. (2019). What drives a positive survey evaluation? The moderating effect of survey attitudes and incentives for the evaluation of the survey. 8th Conference of the European Survey Research Association (ESRA).
• Sachse, J. (2019). Do Metrics Matter? The Effect of Indicators on Scientific Search Behavior. Proceedings of 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR ’19), 417–420. https://doi.org/10.1145/3295750.3298973
• Sachse, J. (2019). The influence of snippet length on user behavior in mobile web search: An experimental eye-tracking study. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 71(3), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-07-2018-0182

• Schauenburg, G., Conrad, M., von Scheve, C., Barber, H. A., Ambrasat, J., Aryani, A., & Schröder, T. (2019). Making sense of social interaction: Emotional coherence drives semantic integration as assessed by event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 125, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.002

• Schröder, D. J. (2019). Soziale Kontrolle. In B. Schnettler, R. Tuma, D. vom Lehn, B. Traue, & T. S. Eberle (Eds.), Kleines Al(e)phabet des Kommunikativen Konstruktivismus: Fundus Omnium Communicativum (pp. 405–407). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24958-8_20